106. Moreover, to avoid the sort of dilemmas and that arose inside the Latvia as a result of getting the freedom and you will restoring their statehood, plus trouble which have perhaps not (yet) become encountered from inside the Latvia, however, that could take place in the near future or even in most other cases which have comparable has actually, the Rapporteur thinks that worldwide area would be to adopt next standards, as seen whenever discussing techniques regarding thinking-devotion, secession, the new states’ development and you may states’ succession:
Narotchnitskaya, Deputy Chairman of the County Duma Panel to your Worldwide Situations (Rodina Faction)
– just in case a different condition emerges down to a system from international mind-commitment and you can secession, all persons commercially living into area of the condition at the the fresh new go out of their liberty are certain to get the full and undisputed to easily choose the citizenship of your respective condition or of every other state as a consequence of you to definitely procedure and you may which ’s the replacement of that condition within this which the care about-commitment taken place;
– assuming yet another state is provided right down to a good liberation processes which closes a foreign career, the persons commercially residing into the their region in the day out of their liberty, also people who paid truth be told there consequently as well as in this new perspective of community, can get a complete and you can undisputed to select the citizenship of one’s respective condition with the exception of people who, about do it of occupant’s power possess violated people rights; each one of these ethno-culturally connected to the previous tenant, whom paid regarding newly liberated condition since the impact and you may in the context of the latest profession and you can just who picked the new citizenship on the condition adopting the withdrawal of the occupant’s military forces and administration, might possibly be subject of your own lustration steps enhanced from inside the conformity that have individual rights standards and you can following the legislation recommended of the PACE’s Solution 1096 (1996) regarding the dismantlement of lifestyle of totalitarian communist assistance;
– any request out of a keen ethno-social classification (national minority) to have interior notice-commitment cannot be considered by worldwide neighborhood because justified and genuine in the event the:
a) the state whoever owners the newest people in the 
brand new requesting classification (minority) try, areas and you can enforce within the good faith the new minimal Western european conditions, norms, criteria and you will guidance about the minorities’ liberties;
b) the interior self-dedication appears to your any kind of inner inter-ethnic isolation and you can leaves in jeopardy the fresh new cultural integration in addition to financial, societal, political otherwise moral cohesion of one’s county;
c) the internal mind-dedication has in view to get ready the fresh country’s area or the management towards the purely cultural basics or to institute the brand new domination out of a social-cultural group over another cultural-ethnic organizations lifestyle toward a specific territory.
Mitrofanova, Head of one’s Russian Center on global scientific and cultural collaboration during the Overseas Ministry
– in those times if the inner self-devotion couldn’t meet the requirements because justified and you may legitimate, it can be nevertheless allowed for the basics and as brand new private result of inner political dealings amongst the government of your own worried condition and its particular curious selection of people.
– Meeting with Mr Valentin Ovsyannikov, Minister-Counselor of one’s Russian Federation Embassy from inside the Latvia and Mr Vladimir Ivanov, Counsellor of the Russian Federation Embassy inside Latvia
Comments from the Mr Boriss Cilevics, Person in the fresh new Latvian Delegation for the Advice memorandum submitted by Mr Adrian Severin, Rapporteur (File As the/Jur (2006) 14)
1. Para.11 [See new paragraph 18 in document AS/Jur (2006) 27 rev]: “Legally, the non-citizens are not stateless persons”. In fact, this is true merely from the point of view of the national legislation of Latvia: non-citizens are not, indeed, subjects of the Law on Stateless Persons, and their status is regulated by another piece of legislation – the Law on the Status of the Former USSR Citizens who are Citizens of neither Latvia nor another State of 1995. However, from the point of view of international law, the non-citizens certainly are stateless persons – as international law does not envisage any other categories besides citizens, foreigners, and stateless persons. Latvia’s non-citizens are defined as stateless in a number of documents of the EU and other international organizations. As to the differences in rights between citizens and non-citizens, the latest updated list with comments was prepared by the Latvian Human Rights committee and is available (in Russian) at .